home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- With the addition of true multitasking to Windows 4.0, and NT, is there really
- the same need for the asynchronous versions of the Socket routines? Or am I
- missing the reason for these routines in the first place?
-
- I am about to develop an application with the Windows Sockets API for Windows
- 4.0, and need to decide which set of routines to use.
-
- Any help on this is appreciated.
-
- Ken Carpenter
- Research & Development
- Delta Controls
- From news@bigblue.oit.unc.edu Mon Feb 14 22:42:04 1994
- Received: from bigblue.oit.unc.edu by SunSITE.Unc.EDU (5.65c+IDA/FvK-1.07) with SMTP
- id AA05881; Mon, 14 Feb 1994 19:26:43 -0500
- Received: by bigblue.oit.unc.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
- id AA23293; Mon, 14 Feb 1994 19:02:30 -0500
- Received: from GATEWAY by bigblue with netnews
- for winsock@sunsite.unc.edu (winsock@sunsite.unc.edu)
- To: winsock@sunsite.unc.edu
- Date: 14 Feb 1994 22:42:04 GMT
- From: tex@gandalf.umcs.maine.edu (Tex)
- Message-Id: <2jounsINNid5@saturn.caps.maine.edu>
- Organization: Foobar inc.
- Sender: ses
- Subject: Looking for Telnet
-
- I'm looking for a good telnet package for the winsock.
- Presently using the NCSA version, works ok, but would like more options
- like key defines and terminal emulations
-
-